在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
87% -
了解详情
![]()
91% -
了解详情
![]()
64% -
了解详情
![]()
78%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排座椅
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
The Proace scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the full scale crash tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and protection was good apart from marginally raised neck tension. In the side barrier impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 13.4 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. Euro NCAP does not perform tests to the front edge of the bonnet for vehicles in this category. The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with test results ranging from good to poor.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.78% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.72% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.57 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | Driver's seat | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格The Proace has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder for the driver and passenger seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard equipment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Peugeot Traveller 2.0 diesel, 'Navette', LHD
车身式样 - Van
公布年份 2015
整备质量 1900kg
评级适用的 VIN - All Toyota Proaces
级别 商用及家用厢式车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The Toyota Proace is identical to the Peugeot Traveller in all ways related to safety, including the fitment of safety equipment. Accordingly, the assessment of the Proace is based on tests conducted on the Peugeot Traveller.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of safety would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Currently, the full width rigid barrier test is not done on vehicles in the Business and Family Van category. In the side barrier test, the Proace scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal chest protection but the protection of other body areas was rated as good. A geometric assessment indicated good whiplash protection for the front seat occupants but poor whiplash protection for those in the rear.