在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the dynamic tests, the Vitara scored maximum points for its protection of the 1 year dummy. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing child restraint, was not excessive although measurements of the neck tension were marginally high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 17.9 分
骨盆碰撞 3.8 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested. However, the protection provided to the pelvis area was mixed, some areas showing good protection and others poor. The surface of the bonnet provided good protection to the head of a struck pedestrian in almost all areas tested, with some poor results only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set |
性能 | ||
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 3.6% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.4% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.01 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Radar Brake Support | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-100 公里/小时 | 10-100 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 25 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 65 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 60 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Vitara, as is a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation system is an option but is expected to be fitted to most vehicles sold and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option. Although the system's low-speed functionality was not eligible for assessment (as the system is not standard), its functionality at the higher speeds typical of inter-urban driving was included and its performance was good. A lane departure warning system is not available for the Vitara.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Suzuki Vitara 1.6 GL+, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2015
整备质量 1114kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Vitaras of the specification tested
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
评级有效性
















在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Vitara remained stable in the frontal offset test. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the passenger dummy in this test, with good protection of all body areas. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Suzuki showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal impact, protection of the front passenger was good for all body regions except the chest, protection of which was adequate. For the rear passenger, protection of the neck and chest was adequate and that of the head and femurs was good. The Vitara scored maximum points in the side impact barrier test with good protection of all critical body areas. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection was good for all areas and maximum points were scored. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision and a geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good protection. The Vitara has an autonomous emergency braking system which operates at the low speeds typical of city driving. However, as the system is not standard equipment, its AEB City functionality did not qualify for inclusion in the assessment.