- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, measurements of neck tension in the 10-year dummy indicated a marginal level of protection. Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good, both for the 10-year and 6-year dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for the which the Megane E-Tech is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 12.4 分
骨盆碰撞 1.7 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking system | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points. However, protection of the pelvis was mainly weak or poor. The autonomous emergency braking system, fitted as standard, can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles. The system performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera based, subsigns supported |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | DAA |
类型 | Steering input |
运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Lane Keep Assist |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera and radar |
In tests of its response to other vehicles, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately. A lane support system gently corrects the steering if the car is drifting out of lane and it can also intervene more aggressively in some other, more critical, situations. The speed assistance system can detect the local speed limit and presents the information to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. A seat belt reminder is standard for all seating positions.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Megane E-Tech EV60 220ch 'Techno', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2022
整备质量 1636kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Megane E-Techs
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | E-TECH EV60 220ch | MEGANE E-TECH EV60 220ch optimum charge* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | E-TECH EV60 220ch | MEGANE E-TECH EV60 220ch super charge | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | E-TECH EV40 130ch | MEGANE E-TECH EV40 130ch standard charge | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Megane E-Tech remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Apart from the driver’s chest, protection of which was adequate, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Megane E-Tech would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical body areas, for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Megane E-Tech has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection. The Megane E-Tech has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, but there is no system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.