在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
68% -
了解详情
![]()
73% -
了解详情
![]()
53% -
了解详情
![]()
71%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
Based on dummy readings in the frontal and side tests, the car scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year infant. That dummy was sat in a forward-facing seat, using ISOFIX anchorages which are not currently standard equipment but which will become so in July 2013. Forward movement of the head was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seating position without first disabling the airbag are clearly indicated on the inside of the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 13.2 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points, providing good protection to pedestrians' leg in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child or of an adult, protection was poor or marginal with some areas offering good protection.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.87% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.75% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.01 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
Electronic stability control is currently optional on some variants but becomes standard equipment on all variants in July 2013. The system met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment now but a passenger reminder does not become standard until July 2013. The systems met Euro NCAP's requirements. A reminder for the rear seat belts is not available and there is no speed limitation device on the 107.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Toyota Aygo 1.0 High Grade, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2012
整备质量 845kg
评级适用的 VIN - see comments
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
In terms of frontal impact performance, the current Peugeot 107 is the same as the Citroën C1 that was tested in 2005 and the results of that test have been used here. The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal test. However, the driver’s chest struck the steering wheel during the impact and the score for that body region was penalised. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. However, inspection of the dashboard showed that some structures might pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. There was little deformation at the footwell but testers noted that the brake pedal was displaced rearward and was blocked, increasing the risk of injury to the driver’s lower legs and feet. In the side barrier and more severe side pole impacts, the car was equipped with side impact head and thorax airbags which are available as an option now on some variants but become standard on all variants in July 2013. In both tests, dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the chest. The seat and head restraints provided poor protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.