Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
了解详情
![]()
79% -
了解详情
![]()
77% -
了解详情
![]()
71% -
了解详情
![]()
56%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排座椅
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) |  |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
The Corsa scored maximum points in the dynamic tests for its protection of the 1½ year infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive although chest and neck forces were marginally high. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the Corsa. However, ISOFIX anchorages are available as an option on the front passenger seat and it was found that engagement of the ISOFIX probes was difficult for the Britax-Römer Duo Plus restraint.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.3 分
骨盆碰撞 5.3 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, with good results in all areas tested. The front edge of the bonnet offered good protection to the pelvis region in most of the test areas. The bonnet surface provided predominantly good or adequate protection to a pedestrian's head over most of its surface. Poor results were recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 限速功能 | Manually Set |
| 系统名称 | ESP+ | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is available as an option. As it is expected to be fitted to most cars sold, it was included in the assessment and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. Autonomous emergency braking is not available on the Corsa but a lane support system is available as an option. As this system is not expected to be fitted to most cars sold, it was not included in the assessment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 评级有效期
规格
试验车型 Opel/Vauxhall Corsa 1.4 'Enjoy', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2014
整备质量 1113kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Corsas of the specification tested
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
高级安全奖
评级有效期
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Opel demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compressions indicated a weak level of protection for the chest, although protection of other areas was still good. The front seats and head restraints provided a marginal level of protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision while a geaomtric assessment of the rear head restraints indicated poor protection.