在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
The Karl scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic crash tests. In the frontal offset barrier test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive although chest and neck decelerations were marginally high. In the side impact barrier test, the 1½ year dummy was properly contained within the shell of its restraint, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. However, the surface of the 3 year dummy's head was just outside the outer wing of the restraint and scored no points for head containment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the Karl is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.9 分
骨盆碰撞 2.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points, providing good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested. The protection offered to the pelvic region was far more mixed, some areas performing well and some poorly. The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate on the bonnet surface and on the windscreen, with poor protection observed at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set |
系统名称 | ESC | |
性能 | ||
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.5% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.2% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.1 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
类型 | Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible & Visual |
性能 | |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
The Karl has electronic stability control as standard, together with a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is an option, as is a lane departure warning system. The Karl does not have an autonomous emergency braking system.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Opel Karl/Vauxhall Viva 1.0 Enjoy, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2015
整备质量 920kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Opel Karls
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Karl remained stable in the frontal offset test. Examination of the high speed films and of the dummy traces showed that the head of the driver dummy was not stable on the airbag. There was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent the head from flattening it and the head made contact, through the deflated bag, with the steering wheel. Thereafter, the head was unstable and rolled off the steering wheel to one side. The score for head protection was penalised and its protection was rated as adequate. Dummy readings in the lower leg indicated marginal protection of this part of the body for the driver. In the full-width rigid barrier frontal impact, the driver's pelvis slid beneath the part of the seatbelt passing over the lap. This is known as 'submarining' and presents risks to the knee, femur and pelvis. The score for this body region was penalised and protection was rated as poor. In the side barrier test, the Karl scored maximum points with good protection of all body regions. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings showed very high rib deflections and protection of the chest was rated as poor, indicating a high risk of serious injury. Opel intend to make improvements to the chest protection in side impacts. The front seats and head restraints showed a marginal level of protection against whiplash injury in the event of the rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated the same level of whiplash protection for the rear seat occupants. Autonomous emergency braking is not available on the Karl.