-
了解详情
![]()
84% -
了解详情
![]()
81% -
了解详情
![]()
75% -
了解详情
![]()
68%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
后排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
The Pulsar scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ dummy in the dynamic tests. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive although tensile forces in the neck were marginally high. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled, allowing a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch is deep inside the glove box and would would not be obviously available to someone placing a child restraint in the passenger seat. Information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag was also not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. All child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated by the Pulsar.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 15.8 分
骨盆碰撞 5.5 分
腿部碰撞 6 分
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested and scored maximum points. The front edge of the bonnet was also predominantly good. The surface of the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 限速功能 | Manually Set |
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Forward Emergency Braking | |||
| 类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| 运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
| 其他信息 | Default On | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
| 运行速度 | 5-200 公里/小时 | 5-200 公里/小时 | ||
| 接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 35 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
| 接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
| 近距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
| 远距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
The Pulsar has a standard-fit seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. Electronic stability control is also standard. An emergency braking system is available as an option but is expected to be fitted to most cars sold. As it is not standard equipment, its low-speed (City) functionality was not assessed but as it is expected to be fitted to most cars sold, its higher speed system was assessed and rated as adequate. A driver-set speed limiter is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of that type. A lane-support system is available as an option but was not assessed as it is unlikely to be fitted to most sales.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 年审和改款
规格
试验车型 Nissan Pulsar 1.2 Acenta, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2014
整备质量 1262kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Pulsars of the specification tested
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
视频
年审和改款
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the legs and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. Even in the more severe side pole test, the chest was adequately protected and other body regions were well protected against injury. Assessment of the front seats indicated marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good protection.