-
了解详情
![]()
86% -
了解详情
![]()
82% -
了解详情
![]()
58% -
了解详情
![]()
70%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Note scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver about the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. The risks of using a rearward-facing seat in the front passenger seat without first disabling the airbag are clearly indicated in the car. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 15 分
骨盆碰撞 0 分
腿部碰撞 6 分
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection provided to pedestrians' legs. However, the protection provided by the front edge of the bonnet was poor in all areas tested. The bonnet surface generally showed good or adequate protection over most of its surface, with poor results recorded along the base of windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 限速功能 | Manually Set |
| 系统名称 | VDC | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 2.168% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.818% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.88 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
The Note has electronic stability control as standard equipment, and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided only for the front. A driver-set speed limitation device is also available and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of that type.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效期
规格
试验车型 Nissan Note 1.2 'Acenta', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2013
整备质量 1052kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Nissan Notes of the specification tested
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效期
年度审查和中期改款
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, the steering column and lock, and the centre console were thought to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, the Note provided good protection of all body regions except the chest, protection of which was adequate. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.