在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas of the 10 year dummy. For the 6 year dummy, protection of the chest was rated as marginal and that of other critical body areas was good. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good and the Micra scored maximum points. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Micra is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.8 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded in the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and the protection of the pelvis area was also good at all test locations. The Micra has, as part of its option pack, an autonomous emergency braking system that detects pedestrians. The score for that system is not included in this rating.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | SAS |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | AEB - FCW | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-200 公里/小时 | 10-200 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 50 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | 时速最高 55 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 |
A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its effectiveness at highway speeds. The Micra also has as standard a driver set speed limitation device. As part of its option pack, the Micra has a lane keep assistance system, the score for which is not included in this rating.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Nissan Micra 0.9 Acenta, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1072kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Micras of the specification tested
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 0.9 litre petrol* | 4x2 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 litre diesel | 4x2 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 litre petrol | 4x2 |
![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Micra remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. Nissan demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal impact, the driver was well protected. Dummy readings for the rear passenger indicated that the pelvis had slipped under the seatbelt and protection of this body area was rated as poor. Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, all critical body areas were well protected and the Micra scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection there. The Micra as, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system that operates at the low speeds typical of city driving at which many whiplash injuries are caused. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, with collisions avoided in at most test speeds.