- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good apart from the neck of the 10-year dummy, protection of which was rated as weak owing to measured values of tensile forces. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the LEAF is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.1 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Intelligent Emergency Braking with Pedestrian and Cyclist Recognition | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate, with some poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs and pelvic region was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Overall, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its protection of vulnerable road users, with performance ranging from good to marginal in the individual test scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter with Traffic Sign recognition |
限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane departure prevention (LDP) |
类型 | LKA |
运行自 | 55 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Intelligent Emergency Braking system | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | No supplementary warning or restraint activation |
The LEAF has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats but missed out on full points as it lacks occupant detection in the rear seats. A standard-fit speed assistance system uses a camera and a digital map to inform the driver of the appropriate limit, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. The lane support system also uses the camera to help the driver not to drift out of lane. This system needs to be activated by the driver and does not switch on by default at the start of a journey. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well overall in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with good performance in most of the test scenarios.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Nissan LEAF 'Acenta', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2018
整备质量 1545kg
评级适用的 VIN - SJNFAAZE10016713
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the LEAF remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the front passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy readings indicated that the dummy head had made contact with part of the vehicle interior, suggesting that there was insufficient pressure in the airbag. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for both front dummies. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good but readings indicated that the force in the lap section of the seatbelt had dropped during the impact. Readings from the chest of the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the LEAF scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.