在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
68% -
了解详情
![]()
81% -
了解详情
![]()
67% -
了解详情
![]()
55%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
外侧
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | 第 3 排 | ||||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | 左 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Evalia scored maximum points for its protection of both the 3 year and 18 month infants. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the risk of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, labelling was not clear and the system was not rewarded. The group 2/3 universal restraint failed the installation check in the rear centre seat but, otherwise, all restraint types could be correctly installed in those seating positions designed to take them.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.4 分
骨盆碰撞 5.0 分
腿部碰撞 4.8 分
The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians' legs in most areas tested. The front edge of the bonnet also provided mostly good protection to the pelvis area. The protection provided by the bonnet in those areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's head was predominantly adequate or marginal.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESC | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.8% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 0.5% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.68 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
The Evalia has electronic stability control as standard equipment and also has a seatbelt reminder for the front seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is available but failed Euro NCAP's requirements as it gives only a visual warning to the driver when the set speed is exceeded.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Nissan Evalia 1.5dCi Full Trim, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door MPV
公布年份 2013
整备质量 1426kg
评级适用的 VIN - TBC
级别 小型 MPV
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
When the car was inspected after the frontal impact test, it was found that the floor panel had torn away from the base of the A pillar and numerous spot welds had released between the floor and sill. The main body of the sill was found to be bent inwards. The passenger compartment was judged to be unstable and the car was penalised. Similarly, the driver's footwell was found to have ruptured and was unstable and a further penalty was applied. Protection of the driver was predominantly marginal. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest. The seat and head restraint offered marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.