- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
Dummy readings indicated good protection of both the 6 and 10 year dummies in both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests. However, the 6 year dummy was not fully restrained in the side impact, and the Limo lost points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the labelling of the switch does not meet Euro NCAP’s requirements for permanency. All of the restraint types for which the Limo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.1 分
骨盆碰撞 5.8 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis region was also good or adequate at all test locations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Limo can respond to vulnerable road users, as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Traffic Sign Recognition |
限速信息功能 | Camera based, subsigns supported |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keep Assist |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera and radar |
The Limo’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats but the car does not have a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A speed assistance system detects the local speed limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Mobilize Limo 'Techo', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2022
整备质量 1600kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Limos
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The EVeasy Limo, unavailable in Europe but sold in Turkey, is identical to the Mobilize Limo tested by Euro NCAP and has the same level of safety equipment. Accordingly, the same level of safety would be expected from the EVeasy Limo.
The passenger compartment of the Limo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Inspection of the vehicle after the test revealed a rupture of the driver’s footwell. A penalty was applied to the score and Mobilize were precluded from demonstrating good knee and femur protection to occupants of sizes other than the dummies used, leading to a marginal rating for that body region. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Limo would be a somewhat aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, apart from the driver’s chest, protection of which was rated as marginal based on compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good but the test score was penalised as the door lock on the rear, impacted side was found to have released. In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was rated as weak, based on rib compressions, but that of other critical body regions was good. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Limo has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s test, with good protection of occupants’ heads. However, Mobilize could not demonstrate robust, symmetrical performance of the centre airbag and the score was penalised. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Limo has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.