- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body regions was good for both child dummies, with the exception of the neck of the ten-year dummy where readings of neck tension indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body areas for both dummies and the EQC scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag is automatically disabled when a rearward-facing child restraint is put in that seating position. Tests showed that the system worked robustly and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the B-Class is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 17.4 分
骨盆碰撞 1.6 分
腿部碰撞 5.9 分
系统名称 | Active Brake Assist | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at almost all test locations. Protection of pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good or adequate. However, protection of the pelvis was predominantly poor. The AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well other cars. Tests of its functionality demonstrated good performance.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Traffic Sign Assist |
限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All Seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
类型 | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Active Brake Assist | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 7 公里/小时 |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. The EQC has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A speed limit recognition system uses a camera and digital mapping to advise the driver of the local limit, and allows easy activation of the speed limiter. A lane support system helps the driver to avoid inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes more aggressively in some certain critical situations.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Mercedes-EQ EQC 400 4MATIC - AMG Line
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 2495kg
评级适用的 VIN - all EQCs
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
高级安全奖
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 400 electric | EQC 400 4MATIC* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant






在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the EQC remained stable in the offset frontal test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. For the passenger, protection of all critical body areas was good. Likewise, in the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical body parts. For the rear passenger, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection for this part of the body, with good or adequate protection elsewhere. In the side barrier impact, the EQC scored maximum points with good protection all-round. Dummy readings indicated good protection for all critical body areas in the more severe side pole test, too. However, a post-test inspection revealed that the upper hinge of the rear impacted-side door had broken, and the car was penalised. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions against another vehicle avoided or mitigated in all test scenarios.