-
了解详情
![]()
82% -
了解详情
![]()
70% -
了解详情
![]()
30% -
了解详情
![]()
86%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
A system is available as an option on the C-Class which automatically recognises when a child restraint is fitted to the front passenger seat and disables the airbag. The system was not fitted to the test vehicle. Without it, a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in the front passenger seat as the airbag cannot be manually disabled. Cars with serial numbers from WDD2040071A159633 have a permanently attached label warning of the dangers of using a rearward facing child restraint in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag. Earlier cars would not have qualified for the 2 points awarded to this label. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages was not clearly marked.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 3.7 分
骨盆碰撞 1.5 分
腿部碰撞 5.6 分
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, the bonnet was rated as predominantly poor for the protection offered to pedestrians' legs by its front edge and to adults' heads by the bonnet surface.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格Electronic Stability Control is standard equipment on all variants of the C-Class. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 年审和改款
规格
试验车型 Mercedes-Benz C 200CDI 'Classic', LHD
车身式样 - 4 door saloon
公布年份 2009
整备质量 1485kg
评级适用的 VIN - WDD2040071A159633
级别 大型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
高级安全奖
年审和改款
The passenger compartment remained stable during the impact. The dummy results showed that the front seat passengers' knees and femurs were well protected and Mercedes were able to demonstrate that the car would provide similar protection to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The car scored maximum points for its performance in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, poor protection of the chest was reflected in high dummy readings for rib deflection. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact was marginal.