在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
The CX-3 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic impact tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both child dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CX-3 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 20.0 分
骨盆碰撞 4.3 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, showing good results in all areas tested. However, protection of the pelvis region was mixed, with areas of good, poor and weak performance. The bonnet of the CX-3 performed well and results were good or adequate over almost the entire bonnet surface.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Adjustable Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set |
系统名称 | DSC | |
性能 | ||
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 3.3% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 3% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.98 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | LDWS |
类型 | Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 70 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible & Visual |
性能 | |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option and is expected to be fitted to most cars sold as is a lane departure warning system. An autonomous emergency braking system for the speeds typical of highway driving is available as an option but is not expected to be fitted enough vehicles to qualify for assessment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Mazda CX-3 2.0 'Core', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door wagon
公布年份 2015
整备质量 1231kg
评级适用的 VIN - all CX-3s
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
评级有效性


















在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the CX-3 remained stable in the offset frontal impact. For the front passenger dummy, all critical body areas were well protected. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal test, the driver passenger scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. However, readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated weak protection of that body region, despite the standard-fit seatbelt pre-tensioners and load-limiters in the rear seats. In the side barrier test, the CX-3 scored full points with good protection of all critical areas. Even in the more severe side pole impact, full points were scored. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats and restraints indicated poor whiplash protection for the occupants of these seats. A low-speed autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option. As it is not standard equipment, it did not qualify for inclusion in the assessment.