- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | 第 3 排 | ||||
乘客 | 左 | 右 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body regions was good for both child dummies, and the MIFA 9 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the MIFA 9 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.3 分
骨盆碰撞 4.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Autonomous Warning Braking | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but poor results were recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Maxus can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Intelligent Speed Assist |
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | DMS (Driver Monitoring System) |
类型 | Lane position |
运行自 | 30 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Lane Keep Asistant |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Autonomous Warning Braking | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MIFA 9 performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit, and the driver can choose to let the car adjust the speed limiter accordingly. However, the speed limit recognition function did not meet Euro NCAP’s requirements and the car scored only for its speed limiter.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Maxus MIFA 9, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door MPV
公布年份 2022
整备质量 2410kg
评级适用的 VIN - all MIFA 9's
级别 大型 MPV
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door MPV | Electric |
Elite Luxury * Ultimate |
4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Maxus MIFA 9 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Maxus demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. For the front passenger, good protection was provided to all critical body areas. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good for both the driver and rear passenger and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the side barrier test, all critical parts of the body were well protected. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest, with good protection of other critical areas. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The MIFA 9 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests, with good protection of the occupants’ heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The MIFA 9 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but it lacks a system to prevent secondary collisions.