在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
With the exception of the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which dummy readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection, all critical body areas were well or adequately protected in the frontal offset test. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ceed is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 14.2 分
骨盆碰撞 5.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed, with results ranging from good to marginal. The AEB system fitted as standard responds only to other vehicles and does not detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Manual Speed Limit Assist (MSLA) |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All Seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) |
类型 | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist (FCA) | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 |
The Ceed has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. Lane support helps to prevent accidental drifting out of lane and also intervenes more aggressively in certain critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps to prevent over-speeding. The standard-fit AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Kia Ceed 1.4T-GDI 'EX', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1240kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Kia Ceeds
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.4 T-GDI* | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 T-GDI | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | Ceed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.4 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | Ceed Sportswagon | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.0 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.4 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.6 T-GDI | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | ProCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.4 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 T-GDI 48V MHEV | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 T-GDI | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 CRDi 48V EV | XCeed | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant






在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Ceed remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Kia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. There was insufficient pressure in the driver's airbag to prevent the head from flattening out the airbag and, in effect, making contact with the steering wheel. Although dummy readings did not reveal critical injury values, the score was penalised and protection of this body area reduced to 'adequate'. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the Ceed scored full points in this test. However, in the more severe side pole test, readings of shoulder force indicated that this part of the dummy had taken much of the load that would otherwise have been on the ribs. As a result, the score for the chest was heavily penalised and its protection was rated as poor. Protection of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Ceed has, as standard, and autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system that operates at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system performed well.