- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child dummies was rated as good or adequate with the exception of the chest of the 6 year dummy, for which dummy readings of deceleration indicated a weak level of protection. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was rated as good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Compass is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.3 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and the pelvis was well protected by front end of the car. The autonomous emergency braking system does not have pedestrian-detecting functionality.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Active Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | LaneSense Lane Departure |
类型 | Lane Keep Assist |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
警告 | Visual |
性能 | |
LKA 确认试验
|
Pass (5/5) |
系统名称 | Forward Collision Warning Plus | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-200 公里/小时 | 30-200 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 |
The Compass has a seatbelt reminder for the front seats only. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at highway speeds, with collisions largely avoided or mitigated. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard, as is a lane departure warning system.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Jeep Compass 4 x 4 Limited, 2.0, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1575kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Compass variants
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.4 MultiAir 140cv | 1.4 MultiAir 140hp FWD 'Sport', 'Longitude' and 'Limited' | 4 x 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 MultiJet 120cv | 1.6 MultiJet 120hp FWD 'Sport', 'Longitude' and 'Limited' | 4 x 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.4 MultiAir 170cv | 1.4 MultiAir 170hp 4WD AUTO Limited | 4 x 4 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 MultiJet 140cv | 2.0 MultiJet 140hp 4WD 'Longitude' and 'Limited'*, including AUTO versions | 4 x 4 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 MultiJet 170cv | 2.0 MultiJet 170hp 4WD AUTO 'Trailhawk' and 'Limited' | 4 x 4 |
![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant






在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver was good. Chest protection for the rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression, but that of other parts of the body was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and full points were scored. However, in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as poor, based on high rib compressions, although these remained lower than the values at which the risk of fatal injuries becomes unacceptably high. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection for occupants sat there. The Compass has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of its performance at the low speeds at which whiplash injuries are often caused showed good performance with collisions avoided or mitigated at all test speeds.