- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of the 6 and 10 year dummies was good or adequate for all critical body areas. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the I-PACE is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.7 分
骨盆碰撞 5.3 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The I-PACE has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and an airbag lifts the bonnet to provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. Jaguar showed that the system detected a variety of pedestrian statures over a wide range of speed so the vehicle was tested with the deployed airbag. The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian predominantly ranged from marginal to good. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. Protection of the pelvis was also predominantly good The AEB system is able to detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. In most tests of these functionalities, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or their severity mitigated, even at night-time in the case of pedestrians.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Adaptive Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Not available | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keep Assist |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Supplementary warning |
The I-PACE has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well or adequately in various tests of its functionality at highway speeds. A standard-fit lane-keep assist system helps to keep the car from drifting out of lane and can also intervene in more severe emergency situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps the driver maintain control of the vehicle speed.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 I-PACE SE EV400
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2018
整备质量 2180kg
评级适用的 VIN - all I Pace
级别 商务车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | I-PACE SE EV400* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant








在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the I-PACE remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Jaguar showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions for all but the passenger's right knee and femur, protection of which was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate for both the driver and rear passenger, and protection of all other critical body areas was good. In both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, maximum points were scored, with good protection of all critical body areas. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.