- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, the head of the 10 year dummy 'bottomed out' the curtain airbag but dummy readings indicated adequate protection for this part of the body. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The rear centre seating position failed the installation test for two belted universal restraints, owing to interference between the restraint and the buckle. Otherwise, restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 14.5 分
骨盆碰撞 5.9 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate but poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good at all test locations, and protection of the pelvis was good or adequate. The autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests against a pedestrian target but the results are not included in this rating as the system is part of an optional safety pack.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | MSLA (Manual Speed Limit Assist) |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | LKA (Lane Keeping Assist) |
类型 | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible |
性能 | |
LKA 确认试验
|
Pass (5/5) |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats, together with a driver-set speed limiter. Lane support is provided by a system that warns the driver when the car is drifting out of lane and gently corrects the steering path. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds but the results are not included in this assessment as the system is part of an optional safety pack.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Hyundai KONA 1.0 T-GDI, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1365kg
评级适用的 VIN - all KONAs
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.0 T-GDI, MT* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 T-GDI, DCT | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, MT | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, DCT | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 CRDi, DCT | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.0 petrol mild hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.6 diesel mild hybrid | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant








在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the KONA remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical parts of the body and that of the rear passenger was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier test, the KONA scored maximum points, with good protection for all body areas. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good. In that test, the front windscreen became detached from the vehicle. The car used for the pole test had previously been used for the pedestrian headform tests and the screen detachment was a consequence of incorrect bonding of the replacement. This behaviour is not representative of production KONAs but has no influence on the dummy readings recorded in the test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as part of an optional safety pack. In tests, it showed good performance at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused but the results are not included in this assessment because the equipment is not standard.