- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body except the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on measurements of neck tension. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10-year dummy was poor and that of the head was marginal, based on high accelerations. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. With the exception of one universal child restraint in the rear centre seat, all of the restraints for which the i10 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.8 分
骨盆碰撞 5.2 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Forward Collision Avoidance (FCA) | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
The bonnet surface provided predominantly adequate or marginal protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars but good results on the windscreen surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The i10’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect pedestrians but not cyclists, for which more sophisticated hardware is required. In tests, the system's response to pedestrians was marginal. The system does not detect pedestrians to the rear of the car, and reversing tests were not performed.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | MSLA (Manual Speed Limit Assist) |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Driver Attention Warning |
类型 | Steering input |
运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | FCA | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera |
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is fitted as standard. The system performed marginally in tests of its detection and reaction to other vehicles. As well as a seatbelt reminder for front and rear seats, the i10 has a driver monitoring system which uses steering inputs to identify whether the driver is alert and focussed on the driving task or is impaired through fatigue or other factors. The system warns the driver if impaired driving is detected. The lane support system gently corrects the steering of the car if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes much more severely in some critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter is standard equipment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Hyundai i10 1.0 MPI GLS, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2020
整备质量 993kg
评级适用的 VIN - all i10s
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the offset frontal test. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as weak, based on dummy measurements of compression. Dummy readings of the knees and femurs were good but some structures in the dashboard were thought to pose a risk of injury so the score was penalised. The i10's low weight and benign front structure did not pose a high risk to the occupants of a colliding vehicle in a frontal offset impact. In the full-width, rigid wall test, protection was good or adequate for all body critical body regions except for the driver's abdomen. The abdomen slid under the lap section of the seatbelt (a phenomenon known as 'submarining') and protection of that body region was rated as poor. In the side barrier test, representing a collision by another vehicle, protection of all critical body areas was good. Similarly, in the more severe side pole impact, protection was good all-round. In an assessment of protection in far-side impact, dummy excursion (its movement towards the other side of the vehicle) was rated as poor. The i10 is not equipped with centre airbags to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The i10 is equipped with an advanced e-Call system which, in the event of an accident, automatically sends a message to the emergency services, giving the car's location.