在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
The HR-V scored maximum point for its protection of the 1½ dummy in the dynamic impact tests. In the frontal offset test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive, although chest and neck decelerations were marginally elevated. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the HR-V is designed could be properly installed in the car, with the exception of the Group I universal restraint, which was not stable when installed in the rear centre position.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.6 分
骨盆碰撞 3.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The HR-V scored maximum points for the protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs. Protection of the pelvic region was more mixed with good and poor results recorded. The protection provided to the head of struck pedestrian ranged predominantly from marginal to good, with some weak and poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
警告功能 | System advised |
限速功能 | System advised |
系统名称 | VSA | |
性能 | ||
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 0.6% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 0.51% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.43 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Departure Warning |
类型 | Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible & Visual |
性能 | |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard on the HR-V together with a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A lane departure warning system and a speed assistance system are both options which are expected to be widely fitted, so qualified for assessment by Euro NCAP. An autonomous emergency braking system which operates at highway speeds is not currently available.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Honda HR-V 1.6 'ES', RHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2015
整备质量 1259kg
评级适用的 VIN - all HR-V's
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
评级有效性












在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good, apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Adequate protection was provided to the neck and chest of the rear passenger dummy, and good protection to the head and femurs/pelvis. The HR-V scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all body regions. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection was good for all critical parts of the body. The seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated a good level of whiplash protection for occupants of those seats. The HR-V has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system which provides additional protection at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests but the score could not be included in the assessment as the front seat whiplash protection was not rated as good.