- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
外侧 *
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | 第 3 排 | ||||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | 左 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection of the neck for the 10-year dummy. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CR-V is designed could be properly installed and accommodated, including in the optional third row seats.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.8 分
骨盆碰撞 3.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs was good in all test areas and the CR-V scored maximum points. Protection of pelvis was mixed. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well in pedestrian tests but was marginal in the more severe cyclist tests.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Intelligent Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Not available | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Road Departure Mitigation |
类型 | LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 72 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Collision Mitigation Brake System | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Supplementary warning and Restraint activation |
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. A camera-based speed assistance system recognises local speed limits and presents the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be manually set to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Honda CR-V 2.0 Hybrid, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1612kg
评级适用的 VIN - all CR-Vs
级别 大型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol hybrid | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the CR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the CR-V scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.