在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
87% -
了解详情
![]()
87% -
了解详情
![]()
79% -
了解详情
![]()
71%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
外侧
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | 第 3 排 | ||||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | 左 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
The car scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic impact tests. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive in the frontal impact, although neck tensile forces were marginally high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle, including those in the optional third row seats.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 16.8 分
骨盆碰撞 5.8 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points, showing good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested. The pelvic area was well or adequately protected. The bonnet offered predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The S-MAX's optional-fit autonomous emergency braking system recognises pedestrians as well as other cars. Euro NCAP will start to assess the performance of such functionality in 2016 so the system cannot be rewarded here.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
| 限速信息功能 | Camera based |
| 警告功能 | System advised |
| 限速功能 | Manually or automatically set |
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 3.1% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.7% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.4 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Lane Keeping Alert and Lane Keeping Aid |
| 类型 | Lane Departure Warning and Lane Keep Assist |
| 警告 | Visual & Haptic |
| 性能 | |
|
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A lane assistance system is an option that is expected to be widely fitted. The system combines lane departure warning with lane keeping assistance i.e. it will warn the driver if the car is drifting to the edge of the lane and will automatically steer the car gently back into its lane if needed. A speed assistance system is also an option. It uses a camera to detect the local speed limit and provides this information to the driver, who can then set the speed limiter appropriately or allow the system to do so automatically. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option but is not expected to be sold in sufficient numbers to qualify for assessment here.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Ford Galaxy 2.0 diesel 'Titanium', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door wagon
公布年份 2015
整备质量 1725kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all S-MAX's of the specification tested
级别 大型 MPV
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
Euro NCAP examined the new Ford S-MAX and confirmed that it would perform equally or marginally better than the Ford Galaxy. Accordingly, the Galaxy was tested but the results of that assessment, and the star rating achieved, are valid also for the S-MAX.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. All critical body areas of the passenger dummy were well protected. Dummy readings showed good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of all body areas was good for except for the chest. Dummy readings indicated adequate chest protection for the driver dummy and marginal chest protection for the rear passenger. Maximum points were scored in both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, with good protection of all body areas. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats, including the optional third row, indicated poor whiplash protection for those seating positions. An autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option but does not qualify for assessment as it is not standard equipment.