- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, good protection was provided to all critical body areas for both child dummies, and the Ranger scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One i-Size restraint could not be properly installed in the rear outboard seats as access to the top-tether is behind the seat back. Otherwise, all of the child restraint types for which the Ford Ranger is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.3 分
骨盆碰撞 4.4 分
腿部碰撞 5.3 分
系统名称 | Pre-collision Assist with Pedestrian Protection | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
Protection of the head was almost completely good or adequate with some poor results along the front edge of the bonnet. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Ford can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and well in tests of its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Driver Alert |
类型 | Lane position |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Lane-Keeping System |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Ford Ranger performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 VW Amarok 2.0/Ford Ranger 3.0
车身式样 - Pick-Up
公布年份 2022
整备质量 2434kg
评级适用的 VIN - all double cabin Rangers
级别 皮卡
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door pick-up | 2.0 diesel Si-T |
Ltd Wildtrak XL XLT |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door pick-up | 2.0 diesel Bi-T |
Ltd Wildtrak * |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door pick-up | 3.0 diesel |
Platinum Wildtrak |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant (some tests done on VW Amarok 2.0 Bi-T)


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The Ford Ranger and VW Amarok are corporate twins with identical structure and safety equipment. The two vehicles share a common rating, derived from some tests performed on the Ranger by ANCAP and some tests performed by Euro NCAP on the Amarok.
The passenger compartment of the Ford Ranger remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Ford demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be an aggressive partner in a frontal collision and it was penalised accordingly. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression but that of the dummy was good for all critical body areas. In both side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body regions and the Ranger scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was adequate. The Ranger has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system worked well in Euro NCAP’s tests, with good protection of the occupants’ heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Ranger does not have an advanced eCall system but is equipped with a system to prevent secondary collisions.