- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
-
了解详情
![]()
94% -
了解详情
![]()
84% -
了解详情
![]()
77% -
了解详情
![]()
74%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
-
接近静止车辆：左偏置
-
接近静止车辆：无偏置
-
接近静止车辆：右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In both the frontal and side barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All restraints types for the which the Puma is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.6 分
骨盆碰撞 6 分
腿部碰撞 6 分
| 系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist with Pedestrian Detection | |||
| 类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 自动刹车功能 | ||||
- 白天
- 夜间
白天
-
成人横穿道路
-
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
-
成人沿道路前行
夜间
-
成人横穿道路
-
成人沿道路前行
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The bonnet generally provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, but poor results were recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and along the windscreen base. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations. The Puma's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to both was good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Intelligent Speed Assist |
| 限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
| 调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| 适用于 | All Seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
| 乘员检测 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Lane Keeping System |
| 类型 | LKA (including LDW) |
| 运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
| 性能 | |
| 车道保持辅助系统 | |
| 人機接口 | |
| 系统名称 | Pre-Collsision Assist | |||
| 类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
- 仅限自动刹车功能
- 驾驶员的警告反应
仅限自动刹车功能
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
驾驶员的警告反应
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
The Puma has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. A speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the limiter to the appropriate speed.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效期
规格
试验车型 Ford Puma
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1314kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Pumas
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效期
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door SUV | 1.0 litre mHev petrol* | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door SUV | 1.0 litre petrol | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 1.5 litre diesel | 4 x 2 | |
|
* Tested variant
年度审查和中期改款
The passenger compartment of the Puma remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all test scenarios.