- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In both the frontal and side barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for both dummies with the exception of the head of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as adequate. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One universal child restraint could not be properly installed in the rear centre seat owing to the centre tunnel preventing correct placement of the support leg of the base. Otherwise, all restraints types for the which the Kuga is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 17.7 分
骨盆碰撞 5.2 分
腿部碰撞 5.8 分
系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided generally good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The Kuga's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to both was good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Adjustable Speed Limiting Device |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All Seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keeping System |
类型 | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 30 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 |
The Kuga has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter helps the driver to avoid over-speeding.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Ford Kuga 2.0 diesel 4x4 automatic, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1769kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Kugas
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5 petrol PHEV | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5 petrol FHEV | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant




在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Kuga remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest and lower leg was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection the driver's chest was again marginal but that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.