- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
外侧
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | 第 3 排 | ||||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | 左 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6-year and 10-year dummies, and the Explorer scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The Explorer automatically disables the airbag is it detects a rearward-facing child restraint in the front passenger seat. The system worked robustly in Euro NCAP's tests and was duly rewarded. Child restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the front passenger seat and in the second row. The optional third-row seats are equipped with ISOFIX/i-Size anchorages. However, issues were found during checks of CRS installation in these seats.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.7 分
骨盆碰撞 2.8 分
腿部碰撞 5.5 分
系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor values recorded at the edge of the bonnet surface. The bumper offered good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with some areas of good protection and some areas that were poor. The Explorer's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most situations. The system showed a marginal level of performance in the more challenging cyclist tests.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Intelligent Speed Assist |
限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All Seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keeping Assist |
类型 | LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Pre-Collision Assist with AEB | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Supplementary warning |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. The Explorer has an intelligent speed assistance system. Digital mapping is used in conjunction with a camera to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver and the the speed limiter is adapted accordingly. A lane support system helps to avoid inadvertent drifting out of lane by warning the driver and gently applying corrective steering. A seatbelt reminder is standard for all seats.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Ford Explorer Plug-in Hybrid, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 2518kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Ford Explorers
级别 大型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol GTDI* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Explorer remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, a post-crash inspection revealed structures in the dashboard which might pose a hazard to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Accordingly, the score for this body region was penalised and protection was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good or adequate, apart from the chest of the rear passenger. For this body area, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for all critical body areas and the Explorer scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection of the chest, while protection of other critical body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided or mitigated in every test scenario.