在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差





- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
The B-MAX scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year infant in the dynamic tests. Forward movement of the dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive and both dummies were properly contained by their restraints in the side impact, minimising the risk of contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Clear warnings are given of the dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seating position without first disabling the airbag.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.0 分
骨盆碰撞 3.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
Good protection was provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs and the car scored maximum points in this area. In those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head the protection offered by the bonnet was predominantly poor. However, in almost every part likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet offered good protection.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | ESP | |
性能 | ||
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 4.11% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 3.51% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.4 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
适用于 | Front seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
Electronic stability control is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the front seats. A speed limitation device is not available on the B-MAX.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Ford B-MAX 1.5 diesel 'Trend', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2012
整备质量 1357kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all B-MAX of the specification tested
级别 小型 MPV
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
高级安全奖
评级有效性












在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the front seat occupants. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. The B-MAX scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger. Likewise, maximum points were scored in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.