- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | |||
---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | ||
乘客 | 左 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10 year child was rated as poor, based on dummy readings of decelerations. The front passenger airbag can be switched off to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. There was insufficient space to install one of the ISOFIX child restraints in the seat behind the driver’s seat. Otherwise, the 500e could accommodate the restraints for which it is designed.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 12.8 分
骨盆碰撞 2.1 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Brake Control | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, some test points demonstrating good protection and others poor. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrian's legs at all test positions. However, protection of the pelvis was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection. The 500e's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system detects vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system's response to such road-users, performance was rated as good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test cases.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Intelligent Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera based, subsigns supported |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Attention Assist / Drowsy Driver Alert |
类型 | Vehicle path in lane |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Lane Control |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Brake Control | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera only |
The 500e’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed marginally in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for all seats and the 500e is also equipped with ‘Drowsy Driver Alert’, which monitors the car’s path within a lane for patterns which are characteristic of a fatigued or inattentive driver. Lane assistance is provided by 'Lane Control’, a system which corrects the car's path if it is drifting out of lane and which also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system detects the local speed limit, and allows the limiter to be set appropriately.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 FIAT 500e 'ICON', LHD
车身式样 - 3 door hatchback
公布年份 2021
整备质量 1328kg
评级适用的 VIN - all 500e
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
3 door hatchback | 87 kW electric motor | Hatchback* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 87 kW electric motor | 3+1 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
2 door roadster | 87 kW electric motor | Cabrio | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the 500e remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. On the driver’s side, some structures in the dashboard were considered to be potentially more aggressive if the occupants knees were to strike at a slightly different location and protection was rated as adequate. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the 500e would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of both the driver and rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on readings of chest compression. All other critical body areas were rated as good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the 500e scored maximum points. Limitation of occupant excursion - the extent to which the occupant is flung to the other side of the vehicle in a side impact - was rated as poor. The 500e is not equipped with a counter-measure to protect against occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injures in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The 500e does not have an advanced eCall system to alert the emergency services in the event of a collision, nor a system to prevent secondary impacts.