- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
45% -
了解详情
![]()
16% -
了解详情
![]()
47% -
了解详情
![]()
7%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings showed poor protection of the head and neck for both the 6 and 10 year children. Chest decelerations indicated weak protection of the chest of the 10 year old. In the side barrier test, the head of the 6 year old dummy was not properly contained within the protective side of the restraint and dummy readings indicated poor protection of this critical body area, also causing high injury risks to the 10 year old due to head-to-head contact. Forces in the neck of the 10 year dummy indicated poor protection for that body areas. Overall, the Panda scored no points in the dynamic tests for its protection of children. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. The Panda has ISOFIX but no i-Size anchorages in the rear outboard seats. Child restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the Panda, except for the optional rear centre seating position.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 12.9 分
骨盆碰撞 5.6 分
腿部碰撞 4.5 分
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal on the surface of the bonnet. However, protection was poor along the windscreen base and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs was predominantly marginal but protection of the pelvis was at least adequate.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 适用于 | Not available | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
| 乘员检测 | |
|
|
|
|||
The Panda has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements for the rear and only the front-seat system scored. The Panda is not equipped with any other driver-assistance system which scores in Euro NCAP's rating scheme.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 FIAT Panda Easy 1.2 Fire, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2018
整备质量 940kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Pandas
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Variant | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |
| All Panda variants |  |
|
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Panda remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings of driver chest compression indicated weak protection of this body area. Test results showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. FIAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated weak protection of the head and neck. Protection of the chest was marginal. Dummy readings of rear passenger chest compression led to a low score for this body region, and this was further penalised because of high shoulder belt loads, leading to the protection being rated as poor. Protection of the passenger's neck was also weak. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on readings of rib compression, with other critical body regions being well protected. No pole test was conducted. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Panda is not equipped with an autonomous emergency braking system.