- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | |||
---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | ||
乘客 | 左 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the head and neck of the 6 year child were rated as weak, based on measured decelerations and tensile forces respectively. The neck of the 10 year dummy was marginally protected. In the side barrier impact, all critical body regions were well protected. The front passenger airbag can be switched off to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. The labels indicating ISOFIX anchorages were not visible to someone installing a child restraint, and the Spring lost points in this part of the assessment. Also, as a consequence of the poor marking, installation checks of ISOFIX child restraints were deemed a fail. The Spring is not equipped with i-Size anchorages so i-Size child restraints cannot be used in the vehicle.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 12.2 分
骨盆碰撞 3.3 分
腿部碰撞 5.8 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrian's legs at all test positions. However, protection of the pelvis was mixed, some locations offering good protection and others poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system reacts only to other vehicles and does not detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | radar |
A seatbelt reminder system is standard for all seats but the vehicle lacks a fatigue-detection system. Lane assistance is not available on the Spring. A driver-set speed limiter is standard. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system showed marginal performance in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Dacia Spring, electric, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2021
整备质量 970kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Springs
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 33 kW electric | Dacia Spring E2 Comfort Plus* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
- |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Spring remained stable in the frontal offset test. Readings of several parameters in the dummies’ legs were high, indicating poor protection, and structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver dummy’s chest was also rated as poor, based on readings of chest compression during the test. The pelvis of the driver was also poorly protected with dummy readings exceeding recommended values. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and of the deformation of the barrier afterwards, revealed that the Spring would be a benign crash partner to other vehicles. In the full width rigid barrier test, the head of the rear passenger was penalised for the extent to which it moved forward, and protection was rated as poor. Chest protection of both occupants was rated as marginal, based on measurements of compression. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, rib compression indicated marginal levels of chest protection, but that of other critical body areas was good. The Spring is not equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injures in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Spring has an advanced eCall system which partially fulfilled Euro NCAP’s requirements, and the car has no multi-collision braking system to prevent secondary impacts. The score was penalised for the high forces needed to open the door post-impact.