-
了解详情
![]()
72% -
了解详情
![]()
77% -
了解详情
![]()
44% -
了解详情
![]()
29%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both the 3 year and 18 month dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the airbag switch was poorly labelled and information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag was not clear, and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag were clearly labelled in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 9.9 分
骨盆碰撞 0 分
腿部碰撞 6 分
The bumper provided good protection for pedestrians' legs in all areas tested and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor, and scored nothing. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet provided poor or marginal protection. In those areas where an adult's head might strike, protection was predominantly poor.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格The Lodgy does not have electronic stability control as standard equipment so it was not assessed by Euro NCAP. A seatbelt reminder is standard on all variants for the driver and passenger seats. A speed limitation device is available as an option but was not assessed by Euro NCAP because it is not standard equipment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 年审和改款
规格
试验车型 Dacia Lodgy 1.5 dCi "Laureate"
车身式样 - 5 door MPV
公布年份 2012
整备质量 1233kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Lodgys of the specification tested
级别 小型 MPV
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
年审和改款
In the frontal impact, the screen pillar was heavily deformed at the top of the windscreen and the roof was bent in front of the B-pillar. The rear passenger floor panel and tunnel were completely separated, extending into the driver's footwell and the transmission tunnel was deformed between the front seats. The car was penalised for the instability of its passenger compartment in the test. Dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the passenger's chest and structures in the dashboard presented risk of injury to the knees and femurs of driver and passenger. Protection of the driver's feet and ankles was rated as marginal, owing to deformation and rupture of the footwell area. In the side barrier impact, protection of head, abdomen and pelvis was good and that of the chest was adequate. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib deformation indicated weak protection of the chest. The seat and head restraint provided poor protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.