- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | |||
---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | ||
乘客 | 左 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest of the 6-year dummy was rated as marginal while that of all other body areas was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was rated as good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear, and the system was not rewarded. Accordingly, rearward-facing restraints failed the installation check for the front passenger seat. In addition, the owner's manual indicates that ISO/R3 restraints are not suitable for the rear outboard seats. Otherwise, restraints could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 9.3 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 5.0 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was no better than adequate and was poor in many test areas. Protection of pedestrians' legs was predominantly adequate while that of the pelvis was good.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
The e-Mehari as a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. Otherwise, it has no driver assistance features that qualify for assessment by Euro NCAP.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Citroën e-Mehari, LHD
车身式样 - 3 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1483kg
评级适用的 VIN - all e-Meharis
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
3 door hatchback | 50kW electric* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
N/A |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the e-Mehari remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were considered a risk to the knees and femurs of occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions, and the score was penalised. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good or adequate for both the driver and the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the e-Mehari scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection of the chest, but that of the rest of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal whiplash protection in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection there.