在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差





- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
Based on dummy readings in the frontal and side barrier tests, the Spark scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year dummy. Both dummies were sat in forward facing child restraints. Forward movement of the head was well controlled in each case. In the side impact, the dummies' were properly contained by the protective shell of their restraints. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear. A permanently attached label warns of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position without first disabling the airbag.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 9.6 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet offered poor protection and scored no points. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult, the bonnet offered predominantly poor protection.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | ESP | |
性能 |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Chevrolet Spark 1.0 base grade, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2009
整备质量 978kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Sparks of the specification tested
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
车辆选配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the head and neck but deflection of the chest indicated marginal protection for the chest of both driver and passenger. Structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and the passenger. The Spark scored maximum points in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Marginal protection was provided against whiplash injurues in the event of rear impact.