在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
92% -
了解详情
![]()
84% -
了解详情
![]()
32% -
了解详情
![]()
71%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
Based on dummy readings, maximum points were scored for the protection provided to both the 3 year and the 1½ year children in the frontal and side impact tests. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year child, sat in a forward-facing seat, was not excessive in the frontal impact and the heads of both dummies were contained by the restraints in the side impact. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 5.5 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bonnet offered poor protection in most areas likely to be struck by a pedestrian's head. Similarly, protection offered by the front edge of the bonnet to pedestrian's legs was poor. Only the bumper scored maximum points, offering good protection.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 |  |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Q5 as is a seatbelt reminder system for the front seating positions.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Audi Q5 2.0TDI "Steppe", RHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2009
整备质量 1660kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Q5s
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal test, the screen pillar moving rearwards only 3mm. Adapative airbags and seatbelts tailor the timing and the degree of restraint to suit the size of the occupant and the severity of the impact. Protection of the passenger was good for all parts of the body. For the driver, the steering column presented a risk of injury to femurs. The car scored maximum points for its performance in the side barrier test with good protection of all body regions. In the side pole test, chest protection was marginal. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries.