- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection for both child occupants. However, the 10 year dummy was not fully restrained during the whole impact and, as a consequence, no points were scored for this dummy. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the U5 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the U5 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.9 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The bonnet provided almost completely good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with a few poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was poor at all test locations. The U5's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to pedestrians was good and to cyclists was marginal. However, the performance in the sub-component pedestrian impact tests was just short of the threshold at which the car would be eligible to score points for its AEB system.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Traffic Sign Recognition and Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 10km/h) |
适用于 | All Seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | LDW and LKA |
类型 | LKA (including LDW) |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Supplementary warning |
The U5 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A lane support system warns the driver if the car is drifting out of lane and also applies the steering gently to correct the vehicle's path. The speed assistance system uses a camera to identify local speed limits. This information is presented to the driver who can then set the speed limiter as appropriate. However, system did not work robustly: many signs were not recognised and the information presented to the driver was inadequate.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Aiways U5, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1750kg
评级适用的 VIN - all U5s
级别 Small Off-Road 4x4
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | Battery electric* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
N/A |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the U5 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Aiways showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good for the driver and good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, dummy readings indicated good protection of all body areas. However, the side curtain airbag had not deployed as designed, getting caught on the interior trim. The score for the driver's head was penalised and its protection rated as adequate. In the more severe side pole test, high readings of acceleration indicated that the airbag had not protected the head from the intruding structure, and its protection was rated as poor. As a result, all points for the pole test were lost. Aiways have since changed the timing of the airbag deployment to try to address the issue. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.