- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Değerlendirmenin Genel Yorumlar bölümünde daha fazla bilgi bulabilirsiniz
Değerlendirmenin Derecelendirme Geçerliliği sekmesinde daha fazla bilgi bulabilirsiniz
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü


- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü


Yolcu
(dıştan takma)
Merkez
Standart olarak araçta
Test aracına takılı değil ama seçenek olarak alınabilir
Mevcut değil
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Üniversal Kemerli CRS
Sorunsuz montaj
montajı dikkatle yapın
güvenlik açısından kritik problem
montaja izin verilmez
Koltuk Pozisyonu | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ön | 2. sıra | |||
Yolcu | Sol | Merkez | Sağ | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Sorunsuz montaj
montajı dikkatle yapın
güvenlik açısından kritik problem
montaja izin verilmez
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10-year dummy was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, for this test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. With the exception of the large universal CRS, which was unstable in the rear centre seat, all of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü

Baş Darbesi 16,0 Puan
Pelvis Darbesi 6,0 Puan
Bacak Darbesi 6,0 Puan
Sistem Adı | Emergency Safety Brake | |||
Tip | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Şu tarihten itibaren operasyonel | 10 Km/S | |||
Performans | | ||||
Otomatik Fren Fonksiyonu |
-
Yakın taraftan gelen bisikletçi, engellenmiş görüş
-
Karşıdan karşıya geçen bisikletli
-
Yol kenarındaki bisikletli
The 408 has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to increase clearance to hard structures in the engine compartment. Peugeot showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds. Accordingly, the car was tested with the bonnet in the raised, 'deployed' position. The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was mostly good over the bonnet surface, with some poor results recorded elsewhere. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points and the protection provided to the pelvis by the front edge of the bonnet was also good across the width of the car. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians. The system’s response to cyclists was good, with collisions avoided in many test scenarios.
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü
Sistem Adı | Speed limit recognition |
Hız Sınırı Bilgi Fonksiyonu | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Hız Kontrol Fonksiyonu | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Şunlara Uygulanır | Front and rear seats | ||
Uyarı | Sürücü Koltuğu | ön yolcu(lar) | arka yolcu(lar) |
Görsel | |||
İşitsel | |||
Yolcu algılama | |||
|
Sistem Adı | Driver Attention Warning |
Tip | Lane position, steering input |
Şu tarihten itibaren operasyonel | 60 km/s |
Sistem Adı | Lane Keeping Assist |
Tip | LKA and ELK |
Şu tarihten itibaren operasyonel | 65 km/s |
Performans | |
Acil Durum Şerit Koruma | |
Şerit Yardımcı Sistemi | |
İnsan makinelerinin arayüzü |
Sistem Adı | Emergency Safety Brake | |||
Tip | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Şu tarihten itibaren operasyonel | 5 km/S | |||
Sensör kullanılır | camera and radar |
A seatbelt reminder system is standard on the front and rear seating positions. The AEB system performed only marginally in tests of its response to other vehicles. A camera-based speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations.
- Teknik Özellikler
- Güvenlik Ekipmanı
- Videolar
- Derecelendirme Geçerliliği
Teknik Özellikler
Test Edilmiş Modeller Peugeot 308 Allure PureTech 130, LHD
Gövde Tipi - 5 door wagon
Üretim yılı 2022
Boş Ağırlık 1397kg
Derecelendirmenin uygulandığı VIN - all 408s
Sınıf Küçük Aile
Güvenlik Ekipmanı
Not: Araç üzerinde diğer ekipmanlar bulunabilir ancak test yılında dikkate alınmamıştır.
Standart olarak araçta
Araçlara güvenlik paketinin parçası olarak takılır
Test edilen araçlara takılmaz ancak opsiyon olarak ya da güvenlik paketinin bir parçası olarak sunulur
Mevcut değil
Uygulanamaz
Videolar
Derecelendirme Geçerliliği
Model Çeşit Yelpazesi
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 1.6 petrol hybrid | GT Hybrid 180 e-EAT8 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol | GT PureTech 130 S&S EAT8 * | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
Tested variant = Peugeot 308 Allure PureTech 130, LHD (with some additional tests on 408)


Değerlendirmenin Genel Yorumlar bölümünde daha fazla bilgi bulabilirsiniz
The Peugeot 408 is very closely related to the 308 tested earlier in 2022. Some additional tests have been performed on the 408 but the rating is largely based on the results of the 308.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Peugeot showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. For the driver, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for that part of the body, and protection of the lower leg was marginal. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression, with that of all other critical body areas rated as good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas good. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. There is no counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The 408 lacks an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.