- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- Daha fazlasını okuyun
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü








- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü


Yolcu
(dıştan takma)
Merkez
Standart olarak araçta
Test aracına takılı değil ama seçenek olarak alınabilir
Mevcut değil
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Üniversal Kemerli CRS
Sorunsuz montaj
montajı dikkatle yapın
güvenlik açısından kritik problem
montaja izin verilmez
Koltuk Pozisyonu | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ön | 2. sıra | |||
Yolcu | Sol | Merkez | Sağ | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Sorunsuz montaj
montajı dikkatle yapın
güvenlik açısından kritik problem
montaja izin verilmez
In the frontal offset test, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated good head protection, marginal chest protection and a weak level of protection for the neck. The 10 year dummy also showed weak protection of the neck. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the chest and head but the score was penalised owing to the diagonal part of the seatbelt slipping off the dummy's shoulder in the test. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Ka+ scored maximum points. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Child restraints could not be properly installed in the rear centre seating position and the iSize anchorages could not be easily engaged for one restraint in the rear outboard seats.
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü

Baş Darbesi 15,8 Puan
Pelvis Darbesi 2,5 Puan
Bacak Darbesi 6,0 Puan
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded on the front edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs with good results at all test points. Protection of the pelvis was mixed, with good and poor results.
- İyi
- Yeterli
- Sınırda
- Zayıf
- Kötü
Sistem Adı | Speed Limiter |
Uyarı Fonksiyonu | Manually set |
Hız Sınırlandırıcı Fonksiyon | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Şunlara Uygulanır | Front seats | ||
Uyarı | Sürücü Koltuğu | ön yolcu(lar) | arka yolcu(lar) |
Görsel | |||
İşitsel | |||
|
The Ka+ has a seatbelt reminder system for the front seats only, and a standard-fit driver-set speed limitation device. Neither autonomous emergency braking nor lane assistance is available.
- Teknik Özellikler
- Güvenlik Ekipmanı
- Videolar
- Derecelendirme Geçerliliği
Teknik Özellikler
Test Edilmiş Modeller Ford Ka+ 1.2, LHD
Gövde Tipi - 5 door hatchback
Üretim yılı 2017
Boş Ağırlık 1059kg
Derecelendirmenin uygulandığı VIN - all Ka+
Sınıf Supermini
Güvenlik Ekipmanı
Not: Araç üzerinde diğer ekipmanlar bulunabilir ancak test yılında dikkate alınmamıştır.
Standart olarak araçta
Araçlara güvenlik paketinin parçası olarak takılır
Test edilen araçlara takılmaz ancak opsiyon olarak ya da güvenlik paketinin bir parçası olarak sunulur
Mevcut değil
Uygulanamaz
Videolar
Derecelendirme Geçerliliği
Model Çeşit Yelpazesi
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback* | 1.2 Manual | 4x2 (FWD) |
![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
Yıllık İncelemeler ve Görünüm Yükseltme işlemleri



The passenger compartment of the Ka+ remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were thought likely to pose a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was penalised. Dummy readings of chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection for this part of the body for both the driver and passenger. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all areas apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. However, measurement of compression indicated poor protection for the chest of the rear passenger dummy and head decelerations demonstrated weak head protection. In contrast, the Ka+ scored maximum points in both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, with good protection of all critical body areas. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated a marginal level of whiplash protection. The Ka+ does not have an autonomous emergency braking system.