Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
-
Läs mer
![]()
90% -
Läs mer
![]()
86% -
Läs mer
![]()
41% -
Läs mer
![]()
71%
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
Förare
Framsäte
Bil
Stolpe
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillvalBased on dummy readings in the frontal and side impact tests, the car scored maximum points for protection of both children. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. A permanently attached label warns of the dangers associated with the use of a rearward facing child restraint in the passenger seat.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Slag mot huvud 8,5 P
Slag mot bäcken 2,4 P
Slag mot ben 4,0 P
The bumper provided predominantly good protection for pedestrians' legs, although stiff structures at the outer edges were rated as poor. The front edge of the bonnet did not score so highly and was rated as marginal in most areas. The centre of the bonnet offered good protection to a child's head but poorer protection towards the edges. In most areas likely to be struck by an adult's head, poor protection was provided.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
| Systemnamn | ESP | |
| Prestanda | ||
| Gäller för | Front seats | ||
| Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
| Visuell | |
|
 |
| Akustisk | |
|
|
|
|||
UnderkändA seatbelt reminder system for the driver and passenger seats is standard equipment. Electronic stability control is an option on some variants in some countries but sales as standard equipment meet Euro NCAP's requirements for the system to be rewarded.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Advanced-utmärkelser
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell VW Polo 1.2 Trendline, LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door hatchback
Årsmodell 2009
Tjänstevikt 1035kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all Polos of the specification tested
Klass Supermini
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Monteras på fordonet som tillval![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig![]()
Gäller ej
Monteras på fordonet som tillvalVideor
Advanced-utmärkelser
Betyg giltighet
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Dela
The passenger cell remained stable in the frontal impact. The car scored maximum points for the protection offered to the passenger. For the driver, the steering column was the only stiff structure which might pose a risk to the femurs. In the car side impact, the car lost a fraction of a point for chest protection. Chest protection was rated as marginal in the more severe side pole test. Whiplash protection was rated as marginal.