- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig






- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
spädbarn upp till 13kg
-
späd- och småbarn upp till 18kg
-
Småbarn från 9 till 18kg
-
Småbarn över 18 kg
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Based on dummy readings from the dynamic tests, maximum points were scored for protection of the 1½ year dummy, sat in a rearward-facing restraint. Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. However, forces measured in the neck and chest indicated poor protection of these areas and the deceleration of the head showed marginal protection. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 18,1 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,8 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The Celerio scored maximum points for the protection provided by its bumper to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was almost entirely poor in its protection of the pelvis area. The bonnet surface offered predominantly good or adequate protection to a pedestrian's head, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Systemnamn | ESP | |
Prestanda |
Gäller för | Front seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
|
The Celerio has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder system for the front seats only. The Celerio does not have a speed-limiter, a lane-keeping assist system or autonomous emergency braking.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Suzuki Celerio 1.0 petrol GL, LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door hatchback
Årsmodell 2014
Tjänstevikt 823kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - applies to all Celerios of the specification tested
Klass Supermini
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Monteras på fordonet som tillval
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Årliga översyner och facelifts















The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Suzuki showed that a similar level of protection would be availabe to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Readings from the lower legs of the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this part of the body. In the side barrier test, the Celerio scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. A head-protecting side impact airbag is available as an option on the Celerio. As it is not standard equipment, the car did not qualify for assessment in the side pole test and no points were awarded. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was rated as good for the front seats but a geomatric analysis of the rear seats indicated a poor level of protection.