- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig








-
Närmar sig en stillastående bil: Förskjutning åt vänster
-
Närmar sig en stillastående bil: Ingen förskjutning
-
Närmar sig en stillastående bil: Förskjutning åt höger
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child occupants was good or adequate with the exception of the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which readings of neck tension indicated weak protection. In the side barrier test, protection of the 10 year old's head was rated as weak on the basis of the decelerations measured there. Otherwise, protection was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the HS is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 15,9 P
Slag mot bäcken 1,1 P
Slag mot ben 5,5 P
Systemnamn | Automatic Emergency Braking System for Pedestrians | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 4 km/t | |||
Prestanda | | ||||
Autobroms funktion |
-
Cyklist som korsar vägen
-
Cyklist längs vägkanten
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with only a few poor results on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at most test locations. However, protection of the pelvis area was mixed. The AEB system of the HS can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the its response to pedestrians, the system performed well and, against cyclists, it performed adequately.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Systemnamn | Speed Assistance System |
Informationsfunktion hastighetsgräns | Camera based |
Farthållarfunktion | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gäller för | All Seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
Passageraravkänning | |||
|
Systemnamn | Lane Depature Prevention System |
Typ | LKA (including LDW) |
Fungerar från | 60 km/t |
Prestanda | |
Körfältshjälp | |
Gränssnitt för mänskliga maskiner |
Systemnamn | Forward Collision Warning System&Automatic Emergency Braking System | |||
Typ | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 4 km/t | |||
Ytterligare information | Supplementary warning |
The HS has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can set the limiter to the appropriate speed. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane. During tests of the AEB system against another vehicle at highway speeds, low-speed impacts with the target meant that the radar had to be re-aligned and the system re-set several times. Such repeated activation of the AEB system and impact with a target is unrepresentative of the real world and the performance of the system was rated as good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most circumstances.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell MG HS 1.5 petrol, RHD
Karosstyp - 5 door SUV
Årsmodell 2019
Tjänstevikt 1489kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all HS variants
Klass Liten SUV
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.5 turbo petrol* |
'Explore' |
4 x 2 | N/A | ![]() |
* Tested variant








Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen

The passenger compartment of the HS remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. MG showed that, with the exception of the underside of the steering column, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical parts of the body, and was good or adequate for the rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the HS scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of rib compression, while that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.