- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In both the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, based on in-test measurements of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the MG 4 Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 15,6 P
Slag mot bäcken 5,5 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
Systemnamn | Front Collision Assist System | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 4 km/t | |||
Prestanda | | ||||
Autobroms funktion |
-
Cyklist från nära, skymd vy
-
Cyklist som korsar vägen
-
Cyklist längs vägkanten
Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, being mostly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but with marginal or poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MG can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and well in tests of its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Systemnamn | Speed Assist System |
Informationsfunktion hastighetsgräns | Camera based |
Farthållarfunktion | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gäller för | Front and rear seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
Passageraravkänning | |||
|
Systemnamn | UDW & DMS |
Typ | steering input and direct eye monitoring |
Fungerar från | 60 km/t |
Systemnamn | Lane Departure Assist System |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Fungerar från | 60 km/t |
Prestanda | |
Nödfilhållning | |
Körfältshjälp | |
Gränssnitt för mänskliga maskiner |
Systemnamn | Front Collision Assist System | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Fungerar från | 4 km/t | |||
Sensorer som använts | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MG 4 Electric performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. A driver-set speed limiter is fitted as standard equipment and met Euro NCAP’s requirements for accuracy.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell MG4 Electric
Karosstyp - 5 door Hatchback
Årsmodell 2022
Tjänstevikt 1685kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all MG 4 Electrics
Klass Liten familj
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Model Name | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | electric | MG 4 EV | 4 x 2* | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen

The passenger compartment of the MG 4 Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but some structures in the dashboard were thought to present a hazard for occupants of different sizes or to those sitting in different positions. Dummy readings of the driver’s chest compression indicated marginal protection of that body region. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection of all critical body areas. However, analysis post-test analysis of the film showed that the head of the rear passenger dummy had moved forward more than is recommended, and protection of that body area was rated as marginal. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, all critical parts of the body were well protected and the MG 4 Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was poor. The MG 4 Electric does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However the rear seats scored no points for whiplash protection as the centre position in that row lacks adequate head restraint. The MG 4 Electric has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash and a system which applies the brakes to prevent secondary collisions.