- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child dummies was good for all body regions except the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as weak, on the basis of measurements of tensile forces. In the side barrier impact, protection of the head of the 10 year dummy was adequate but that of the chest was rated as poor on the basis of accelerations measured during the test. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 14,9 P
Slag mot bäcken 6,0 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
Systemnamn | Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Prestanda | | ||||
Autobroms funktion |
-
Cyklist från nära, skymd vy
-
Cyklist som korsar vägen
-
Cyklist längs vägkanten
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed but was mostly rated as between marginal and good. Poor results were recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations and protection of the pelvis was also good, the car scoring maximum points in these areas of assessment. The autonomous emergency braking system detects vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system’s response to pedestrians was adequate and its response to cyclists was good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test scenarios.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Systemnamn | Manual Speed Limit Assist (MSLA) / Intelligent Speed Limit Assist (ISLA) |
Informationsfunktion hastighetsgräns | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Farthållarfunktion | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gäller för | Front and rear seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
Passageraravkänning | |||
|
Systemnamn | Driver Attention Warning (DAW) |
Typ | Steering input |
Fungerar från | 10 km/t |
Systemnamn | LKA |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Fungerar från | 60 km/t |
Prestanda | |
Nödfilhållning | |
Körfältshjälp | |
Gränssnitt för mänskliga maskiner |
Systemnamn | Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Sensorer som använts | camera |
A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats and a driver monitoring system monitors steering inputs for signs of fatigued driving. The autonomous emergency braking system showed only marginal performance in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. Speed assistance is provided by a system which informs the driver of the local limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the course of a car which is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in more critical situations.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Hyundai BAYON 1.0 T-GDI GL, LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door SUV
Årsmodell 2021
Tjänstevikt 1230kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - from NLHBR81GVNZ144410
Klass City and Supermini
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 1.2 MPI | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.0 T-GDI | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.0 T-GDI 48V MHEV | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
Tested variant: Hyundai BAYON 1.0 T-GDI


Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
The Hyundai i20 is very closely related to the Hyundai BAYON tested by Euro NCAP in 2021 and shares the same safety equipment. Based on data reviewed by Euro NCAP, the two cars can be considered identical as far as safety is concerned and the rating of the BAYON can be applied also to the i20.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that, on the passenger's side, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. However, on the driver's side, structures in the dashboard were considered a risk to occupants' legs and a penalty was applied to the score. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear dummy was rated as weak, based on compression of the chest, but protection was otherwise good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. The car is not equipped with a counter-measure to mitigate occupant to occupant injuries in the event of a side impact. Mitigation of the extent to which a body would be thrown to the opposite side of a car in a lateral collision was rated as poor. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The car is equipped with an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and with MCB, a system which applies the brakes after a collision to reduce the likelihood of secondary impacts.