- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig






- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
spädbarn upp till 13kg
-
späd- och småbarn upp till 18kg
-
Småbarn från 9 till 18kg
-
Småbarn över 18 kg
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the i10 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but chest loads indicated only fair protection of this body region and neck forces were also high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. The information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is clear and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly accommodated and fitted in the i10.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 16,0 P
Slag mot bäcken 3,7 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested and scored maximum points. Protection of the front edge of the bonnet was good at the centre but was poor towards the stiff outer edges. The bonnet surface and windscreen provided mostly good or adequate protection with poor results recorded only on the dtiff windscreen pillars.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Hastighetsgränsfunktion | Manually Set |
Systemnamn | ESC | |
Prestanda |
Gäller för | All seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
|
The i10 has a seatbelt reminder fitted as standard for the front and rear seats, and the system met Euro NCAP's requirements. Electronic stability control is also standard equipment. A driver-set speed limitation device is available as an option and is expected to be fitted to most cars sold. The system met Euro NCAP's requirements for speed assistance systems of this type.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Hyundai i10 1.0 petrol Comfort, LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door hatchback
Årsmodell 2014
Tjänstevikt 933kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - applies to all Hyundai i10s of the specification tested
Klass Supermini
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Monteras på fordonet som tillval
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Årliga översyner och facelifts

















The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different statures or those sat in a different position. In the side barrier test, the dummy readings showed good protection of all body regions. However, inspection of the car after the crash revealed that the rear door on the struck side was not fully latched. Analysis of the high speed film indicated that the handle lifted in the crash, owing to inertia, and that this may have partially unlatched the door. Protection of the chest in the side pole impact was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression. The protection offered by the front seats against whiplash injury in a rear-impact was good but a geometric assessment of the rear head restraints revealed marginal protection.