- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection for both child dummies. However, analysis of the film revealed that the seat belt had partially slipped off the shoulder of the 10 year dummy and, as a result, the overall score for the test was penalised. In the side barrier impact, dummy readings of accelerations indicated weak protection of the head of the 10 year dummy. Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver about the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Some universal child restraints were unstable when positioned in the rear centre seating position but, otherwise, all systems for which the HR-V is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 17,2 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,2 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
Systemnamn | Collision Mitigation Braking System | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Prestanda | | ||||
Autobroms funktion |
-
Cyklist från nära, skymd vy
-
Cyklist som korsar vägen
-
Cyklist längs vägkanten
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points. However, protection of the pelvis was poor almost everywhere along the front edge of the bonnet. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the HR-V can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios. Likewise, the system’s response to cyclists was good.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Informationsfunktion hastighetsgräns | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Farthållarfunktion | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gäller för | Front and rear seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
Passageraravkänning | |||
|
Systemnamn | Road Departure Mitigation System (RDM) |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Fungerar från | 65 km/t |
Prestanda | |
Nödfilhållning | |
Körfältshjälp | |
Gränssnitt för mänskliga maskiner |
Systemnamn | Collision Mitigation Braking System | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Sensorer som använts | camera |
In tests of its response to other vehicles, the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well. A camera-based speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit. This information is provided to the driver who can choose to allow the car adapt the speed limiter as appropriate. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and can also intervene in more critical situations to avoid road departure, for example. A seat belt reminder is provided for the front and rear seats but there is no system to monitor for fatigued driving.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Honda HR-V 1.5 hybrid 'Advance', RHD
Karosstyp - 5 door SUV
Årsmodell 2022
Tjänstevikt 1389kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all HR-Vs
Klass Liten SUV
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ADVANCE STYLE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ADVANCE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ELEGANCE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen

The passenger compartment of the HR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the HR-V would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as marginal, based on measurements of compression. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The HR-V does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The HR-V has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but is not equipped with a system to prevent secondary impacts in the event of a collision.