Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
-
Läs mer
![]()
71% -
Läs mer
![]()
75% -
Läs mer
![]()
54% -
Läs mer
![]()
33%
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
Förare
Baksäte
Framsäte
Bil
Stolpe
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval-
spädbarn upp till 13kg
-
späd- och småbarn upp till 18kg
-
Småbarn från 9 till 18kg
-
Småbarn över 18 kg
![]()
Montera utan problem![]()
montera försiktigt![]()
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem![]()
montering är inte tillåten
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem| Sätesposition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fram | 2:a raden | |||
| Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Montera utan problem![]()
montera försiktigt![]()
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem![]()
montering är inte tillåten
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Slag mot huvud 13,6 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,0 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
| Systemnamn | ESP | |
| Prestanda | ||
| Gäller för | Not available | ||
| Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
| Visuell | |
 |
|
| Akustisk | |
|
|
|
|||
The C-Elysée has electronic stability control as standard. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver's seat but is not available for the passenger seat so the system was not rewarded. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option. As it is fitted to most cars sold, it was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. The C-Elysée is not available with lane assist or autonomous emergency braking.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Karosstyp - 4 door saloon
Årsmodell 2014
Tjänstevikt 1087kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - applies to all C-Elysées of the specification tested
Klass Liten familj
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Monteras på fordonet som tillval![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig![]()
Gäller ej
Monteras på fordonet som tillvalVideor
Betyg giltighet
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Dela
The passenger compartment of the C-Elysée remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.