-
Läs mer
![]()
80% -
Läs mer
![]()
80% -
Läs mer
![]()
62% -
Läs mer
![]()
56%
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
Förare
Baksäte
Framsäte
Bil
Stolpe
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval-
spädbarn upp till 13kg
-
späd- och småbarn upp till 18kg
-
Småbarn från 9 till 18kg
-
Småbarn över 18 kg
![]()
Montera utan problem![]()
montera försiktigt![]()
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem![]()
montering är inte tillåten
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem| Sätesposition | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fram | 2:a raden | ||
| Passagerare | Vänster | Höger | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
![]()
Montera utan problem![]()
montera försiktigt![]()
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem![]()
montering är inte tillåten
Based on dummy readings in the crash tests, the vehicle scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy Forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck forces and chest decelerations were marginally high. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Slag mot huvud 16,3 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,2 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor in all areas tested. The bonnet surface was predominantly adequate or marginal in its protection of the head of a struck pedestrian. Good results were recorded on the windscreen surface but poor protection was offered by the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
| Systemnamn | ESP9 | |
| Prestanda | ||
| Gäller för | Front seats | ||
| Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
| Visuell | |
|
|
| Akustisk | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard as well as a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitiation device is optional but is expected to be sold in sufficient numbers to qualify for assessment in Euro NCAP's tests. There is no lane assist system or autonomous emergency braking.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Toyota Aygo 1 x-play, LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door hatchback
Årsmodell 2014
Tjänstevikt 874kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - applies to all C1s of the specification tested
Klass Supermini
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Monteras på fordonet som tillval![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig![]()
Gäller ej
Monteras på fordonet som tillvalVideor
Betyg giltighet
Årliga översyner och facelifts
In 2014, Citroën demonstrated that the C1 was identical to the Toyota Aygo in every way likely to influence safety. Therefore, the star rating of the Citroën C1 is the same as that of the 2014 Aygo rating and the test results of that car are given in this assessment. However, the rating for the Toyota Aygo published in December 2017 cannot be considered to apply to the C1 as Euro NCAP has received no data to demonstrate that the cars remain the same or that the fitment of safety equipment is equivalent.
Dela
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, the steering column, ignition barrel and the edge of facia and console presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the car scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, protection of all body areas was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate. Protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision was rated as good for the front and rear seats.