- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In both the frontal offset and the side impact barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for all critical body areas, for both the 6 and 10 year dummy, and maximum points were scored for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a reward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 20,8 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,8 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
Systemnamn | Pedestrian Warning with City Braking Function | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Prestanda | | ||||
Autobroms funktion |
-
Cyklist från nära, skymd vy
-
Cyklist som korsar vägen
-
Cyklist längs vägkanten
The i4 has an ‘active’ bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been hit and actuators lift the bonnet surface to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system operated robustly for different pedestrian statures and over a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the bonnet was tested in the raised, ‘deployed’ position and the protection provided was almost completely good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was largely poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the i4 can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and to cyclists.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Systemnamn | Speed Limit Assist |
Informationsfunktion hastighetsgräns | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Farthållarfunktion | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gäller för | Front and rear seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
Passageraravkänning | |||
|
Systemnamn | Attentiveness Assistant |
Typ | Steering input |
Fungerar från | 70 km/t |
Systemnamn | Lane Departure Warning |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Fungerar från | 70 km/t |
Prestanda | |
Nödfilhållning | |
Körfältshjälp | |
Gränssnitt för mänskliga maskiner |
Systemnamn | Collision Warning with Braking Function | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Fungerar från | 5 km/t | |||
Sensorer som använts | camera and radar |
The AEB system performed adequately in tests of its response to other vehicles, with impacts avoided or mitigated in many test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard and the car is equipped with a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning when a pattern characteristic of drowsy or impaired driving is detected. A combined camera/navigation system identified the local speed limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set accordingly. If the car is drifting out of lane, a lane keep assist system gently corrects the vehicle’s path. The system also intervenes in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure for example.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell BMW i4, LHD
Karosstyp - 4 door saloon
Årsmodell 2022
Tjänstevikt 2050kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all i4s
Klass Stor familj
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 eDrive40* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | Battery Electric | i4 M50 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen

The passenger compartment of the i4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers demonstrated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. BMW demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the i4 would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid-barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, for both the driver and rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and maximum points were scored. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The i4 does not have a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The i4 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but no system to apply the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.