Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
-
Lees meer
![]()
71% -
Lees meer
![]()
75% -
Lees meer
![]()
54% -
Lees meer
![]()
33%
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
Bestuurder
Zitplaats achter
Zitplaats voor
Auto
Paal
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
![]()
Standaard uitrusting![]()
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar-
Zuigelingen tot 13 kg
-
Zuigelingen en peuters tot 18 kg
-
Peuters van 9 tot 18 kg
-
Peuters meer dan 18 kg
![]()
Probleemloze montage![]()
montage met beleid![]()
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem![]()
montage niet toegestaan
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem| Positie stoel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voor | 2e rij | |||
| Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Probleemloze montage![]()
montage met beleid![]()
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem![]()
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but neck loads were quite high. Chest deceleration of the 1½ year dummy was also a little high and protection was rated as fair. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with pats of the car's interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the switch, located at the end of the facia, is not labelled clearly enough and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraints which the car is designed to accommodate could be properly installed in the vehicle.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Impact op het hoofd 13,6 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 0,0 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6,0 Ptn
The protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor and scored no points. The protection provided by the bonnet was predominantly good or adequate but was poor at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
| Systeemnaam | ESP | |
| Resultaat | ||
| Geldt voor | Not available | ||
| Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
| Visueel | |
 |
|
| Hoorbaar | |
|
|
|
|||
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Citroën C-Elysée 1.2 Séduction, LHD
Type carrosserie - 4 door sedan
Bouwjaar 2014
Leeggewicht 1044kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - applies to all Peugeot 301s of the specification listed
Klasse Kleine gezinsauto
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
![]()
Standaard uitrusting![]()
Optionele uitrusting![]()
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar![]()
Niet van toepassing
Optionele uitrustingVideo's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
The Peugeot 301 is identical to the Citroën C-Elysée. Data provided by Peugeot-Citroën shows that the results of the tests done on the Citroën would apply also to the Peugeot 301. The comments below are based on tests done on the C-Elysée
Delen
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger in the test. However, structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was downgraded. Readings of chest compression in the driver dummy indicated a marginal level of protection for this body region. In the side impact, protection of all body regions was good, except for the abdomen, protection of which was adequate. However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a weak level of protection for this body region. The score was penalised because some forces were transmitted through parts of the dummy structure which would further load the chest of a human, and protection of the chest area was rated as poor. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was good for the front seats but poor for the rear seats.